<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Thycotic Community - Secret Server - API for managing AD groups - Messages</title>
<link>http://www.thycotic.com/forums/messages.aspx?TopicID=360</link>
<description>Thycotic Community - Secret Server - API for managing AD groups - Messages</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<generator>Jitbit AspNetForum</generator>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:04:23 GMT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:04:23 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<link>http://www.thycotic.com/forums/messages.aspx?TopicID=360</link>
<title>Message from Ben</title>
<description><![CDATA[Hi Espen,<br/><br/>Thanks for all the detailed information, that scenario makes a lot of sense.  I've updated the request with your info.<br/><br/>Regards,<br/>Ben]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:04:23 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.thycotic.com/forums/messages.aspx?TopicID=360</link>
<title>Message from Espen F</title>
<description><![CDATA[Hi Ben,<br/><br/>Thanks for your reply.<br/>I will provide some more detail as of why we seek such a feature:<br/>We are are major Internet application, and service provider with over 250 customers with users varying from a couple, to 50-60 users needing access to limited  parts of our infrastructure.<br/><br/>Say for example that customer1 have 500 servers, and 40 users needing access to those systems.<br/><br/>User A needs access to server 1 and server 2, while user B only needs access to server 2.<br/>This may change from week to week, with users only having access on a strict need to basis only. For over 250 customers, with a total over 4000 servers this becomes very time consuming to   manage manually. <br/><br/>We would like to say via an API that AD-group Y should have access to servers 1,2,3,4,5 (folder/group 1 and folder/group 2).<br/><br/>This comes on top of a growing number of 300 employees. <br/><br/>With such rapid, and large amount of access level changes it is important for us to be able to make effective, and yet secure changes.<br/><br/>Thank you for your time.<br/>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 13:19:52 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.thycotic.com/forums/messages.aspx?TopicID=360</link>
<title>Message from Ben</title>
<description><![CDATA[Hi Espen,<br/><br/>Currently the API is not able to manage permissions on Secrets and Folders.  I've taken this down as a feature request and updated the product manager.  Is there any more detail you can provide regarding your business case for needing this?<br/><br/>Thanks,<br/>Ben]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 11:24:17 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.thycotic.com/forums/messages.aspx?TopicID=360</link>
<title>Message from Espen F</title>
<description><![CDATA[Hi,<br/>I wonder if the API is able to manage which AD users/groups who should have access to which secret/folder.<br/><br/>This is an important feature for us as we have a high change frequency in our server farms.]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 02:24:09 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
